[Free Tool] Find the ideal Growth Strategy, customized for your business and product

A/B Testing Gone Wrong: The 5 Most Common Technical Mistakes Marketing Teams Make

ab testing common mistakes

Even experienced marketing teams can fall into traps that compromise the validity of their A/B tests. Let’s discuss five common technical mistakes and how they can affect your results.

1. Inadequate sample size

An insufficient sample size increases the risk of drawing incorrect conclusions from your A/B test. It can lead to Type I errors (false positives) or Type II errors (false negatives), resulting in wasted resources and misguided optimization efforts.

To calculate the appropriate sample size, you’ll need to consider the baseline conversion rate, minimum detectable effect (MDE), and desired statistical power. Using a sample size calculator – like this one from Optimizely – determine the number of participants required to achieve statistical significance and minimize the risk of errors. Remember to account for both test variations and adjust your traffic allocation accordingly.

2. Running multiple tests simultaneously

Conducting concurrent A/B tests on the same audience can introduce interaction effects between different variations, confounding your results. These interactions can mask the true impact of individual changes, causing you to misinterpret the outcomes.

To avoid this issue, consider these strategies:

  • Run tests sequentially, ensuring each test is completed before starting the next.
  • Employ a full factorial multivariate testing approach to analyze all variations within a single test.

3. Ignoring statistical significance

Not achieving or disregarding statistical significance can lead to incorrect conclusions about the impact of your test variations. When a test is stopped prematurely, it may not have reached the necessary significance level (typically 95% or higher), increasing the likelihood of false positives or negatives.

To avoid these issues:

  • Allow tests to run for a sufficient duration to achieve statistical significance.
  • Use sequential testing methods like Bayesian inference, which allow for more flexible stopping rules and the possibility of stopping a test early if a clear winner emerges.
  • Use a tool to help you calculate the statistical relevance of the results. Like this one from CXL

4. Overlooking carryover effects

Carryover effects occur when the results of previous tests influence the outcomes of subsequent tests. This can happen if you fail to reset cookies or user sessions between tests, leading to a biased assessment of your variations’ performance.

To prevent carryover effects:

  • Ensure that you reset user data, such as cookies or sessions, between tests.
  • Allow for a “cooling-off” period between tests to reduce the impact of any lingering effects from previous experiments.

5. Failing to account for external factors

External factors, like seasonality, holidays, or industry trends, can influence your A/B test results. If you don’t account for these factors, you may misattribute changes in performance to your test variations rather than external influences.

To control for external factors:

  • Run tests during stable periods with minimal external disruptions.
  • Use techniques like difference-in-differences or time series analysis to account for external factors in your data analysis.
  • Perform sensitivity analyses to assess how robust your findings are to potential confounding factors.

By understanding these common technical mistakes and their implications, you can design more rigorous A/B tests and draw more accurate conclusions from your results.

Increase your ROAS with our User Tracking & Conversion Measurement Newsletter!

Continue reading

Increase your ROAS with our User Tracking & Conversion Measurement Newsletter!